SUMMARY
Background. Rock climbing protection devices are crucial for climbing practice safety and for mountaineering in general. The use of these devices, together with appropriate techniques, reduces injuries in the critical event of a climber’s fall. Although European standards and rules support the manufacturer in the design, production and laboratory testing, a thorough investigation of their behaviour in a real environment and during an actual placement has not yet been performed.
Methods. The aim of this work is to present an insight into the strength of such devices through the application of a monitored, quasi-static, increasing force in a field environment. Results from several types of devices (pitons, nuts and cams) are presented and critically evaluated with respect to the values of the loads acting on the anchors due to the fall of the climber.
Results. As far as the piton actual strength is concerned, the present activities show that the characteristics requested by EN specifications and rules are functional for product qualification purposes, but of very little use when defining the load holding capabilities once the devices are in place. However, even if the actual strength does not match the requirement of the standard, the comparison with the actual load applied is fairly encouraging. With regards to nuts and cams, it is worth underlining the importance of a correct placement: when placed correctly, the actual strength achieved by the device in the field complies and is higher than the classification of the EN standard. Moreover, an investigation of human capability to predict the ultimate strength of rock-climbing protection devices placed in the field has been carried out, with the aim of verifying the reliability of the climber’s judgement, and, possibly, improve the safety of the in-field decision-making process.
Conclusions. The lesson learned from the experiments is that modern equipment shows one step better behaviour and, similarly to pitons, the device-rock coupling dictates the pairs actual strength, assuming of course a sound placement. To the author’s best knowledge, the present work represents the first attempt to investigate the human capabilities to assess the reliability of a protection placement in-field.
Assessment of the Ultimate Actual Strength of Rock-Climbing Protection Devices: Extraction Tests in the Field and the Human Capability to Predict the Ultimate Strength
A. Manes, F. Cadini
Original Article, 244-256
Keywords: actual strength, human prediction, Rock-climbing protection,
Table of Content: Vol. 10 (No.2) 2020 April/June
-
Systems & Methods in Extreme Sports Medicine
F. Feletti, A. P. Moorhead, O. Mei-DanEditorial, 154-155 -
Injury Patterns and Wilderness Medical Preparedness in BASE Jumping
J. W. Sieker, G. M. Vilke, M. S. Schongalla, O. Mei-DanOriginal Article, 156-164 -
Use of a Prospective Survey Method to Capture a Picture of Overuse Injuries in Kitesurfing
R. Paiano, F. Feletti, M. Tarabini, P. BuzzacottOriginal Article, 165-170 -
Injury Prevention in The Sport of Surfing: An Update
A. NathansonOriginal Article, 171-178 -
Injuries in Mountain Biking and Implications for Care
D.C. Fiore, K. M. Fellows, T. A. HennerOriginal Article, 179-191 -
Rodeo Injuries: The Role of Safety Equipment
C. R. Reisenauer, J. W. StonebackOriginal Article, 192-200 -
Current Trends in Sport Climbing Injuries after the Inclusion into the Olympic Program. Analysis of 633 Injuries within the years 2017/18
C. Lutter, T. Tischer, T. Hotfiel, L. Frank, A. Enz, M. Simon, V. SchöfflOriginal Article, 201-210 -
A Review of Head Injury and Impact Biomechanics in Recreational Skiing and Snowboarding
D A. Patton, A. S. McIntosh, B. E. Hagel, T. KrosshaugReview, 211-232 -
Tendon Injuries in the Hands in Rock Climbers: Epidemiology, Anatomy, Biomechanics and Treatment – An Update
V. Schöffl, I. Schöffl, L. Frank, T. Küpper, M. Simon, C. LutterOriginal Article, 233-243 -
Assessment of the Ultimate Actual Strength of Rock-Climbing Protection Devices: Extraction Tests in the Field and the Human Capability to Predict the Ultimate Strength
A. Manes, F. CadiniOriginal Article, 244-256 -
Practical and Conceptual Analysis of Wingsuit BASE Flight
A. Stöckl, J. Sieker, A. Westman, O. Mei-DanOriginal Article, 257-268 -
Altitude Training and Endurance and Ultra-Endurance Performance
M. MarzoratiMini - Review, 269-273 -
Accidents and Risk Related Behaviours in Downhill Mountain Biking in Regard to Trail Choice
A. Frühauf, M. Huter, E. Weiß, M. KoppOriginal Article, 274-279 -
Hand-arm vibration in motocross: measurement and mitigation actions
M. Tarabini, N. Mauri, I. Gaudio, S. Cinquemani, A. P. Moorhead, R. Bongiovanni, F. FelettiOriginal Article, 280-289 -
Review on Reported Concussion, Identification and Management in Extreme Sports
C. N. Seehusen, V. Mucci, K. E. Welman, C. J. Browne, F. Feletti, A. J. ProvanceReview, 290-299 -
Surgical treatment of muscle injury. A review of current literature and indications
A. Giai Via, G. Discalzo, F. Oliva, R. Matteotti, N. MaffulliReview, 300-308 -
Conceptualising Performance Enhancement in Extreme Sports: Combining Physiological and Psychological Perspectives
E. Monasterio, E. Brymer, I. StewartOriginal Article, 309-314 -
An Ecological Dynamics Perspective of Return to Play Decision-Making for Extreme Sport Athletes
J. Nyland, A. Smith, B. Pyle, O. Mei-DanOriginal Article, 315-324 -
Protective and Supportive Garments and Bracing to Enhance Extreme Sport Performance and Injury Prevention
J. Nyland, A. Cecil, R. Singh, C. Raj PandeyOriginal Article, 325-332 -
A Systematic Review of Smart Clothing in Sports: possible Applications to Extreme Sports
S. Scataglini, A. P. Moorhead, F. FelettiOriginal Article, 333-342